EU border with Belarus
/The Haldane Society has endorsed the European Lawyers for Democracy and Human Rights’ motion on refugee & human rights at the EU-Belarus border, as set out below.
“The human tragedy at the EU border with Belarus is another example of the EU's failed refugee policy. The criminal treatment of refugees in Croatia recently revealed by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), the countless drowned refugees in the Mediterranean and recently in the English Channel, the refugee prevention agreements with Turkey, Libya and Morocco provide further examples.
There is an impression that the EU wants to use this refugee drama on the EU Border with Belarus as a welcome distraction from its own inhumane refugee policy. Approximately 8000 refugees are stranded in the forests on the EU border with Belarus. They are subjected to inhumane conditions there. For at least 12 of them, this has already ended in death.
While we condemn the irresponsible conduct of the Belarus leadership in using migrants, we urge a humane response from the EU and its Member States which is in line with EU and international legal rights and obligations.
Highly vulnerable groups have been weaponised in this struggle. They include pregnant women, young children, elderly and sick people wo have fled war and persecution from Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan and Iraq, who in the absence of safe migration routes have ended up as pawns on a European border in freezing conditions.
ELDH therefore demands the following responses:
1. Access to seeking asylum at the borders
Access to asylum in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia should immediately be restored, both in law and in practice in accordance with EU and international law, irrespective of the manner of arrival. All measures aimed at preventing people from accessing EU territory, (such as forceful pushbacks using water cannons and tear gas, prohibiting and limiting access to mechanisms for lodging of asylum claims from those who make it across the border into Europe) should cease.
2. Withdrawal of non-compliant domestic legislation
The rush of refugees at the EU border with Belarus does not give the EU the right to endorse the temporary suspension of the application of the ECHR and international refugee law for the countries bordering Belarus.
ELDH calls on the European Commission to reverse its decision to endorse changes by Lithuania, Poland and Latvia to their domestic asylum legislation to render it incompatible with EU asylum Treaties, the Charter for Fundamental Rights and international law. Whilst some of these changes are described as temporary, and have geographic restrictions, such derogation from human rights principles risks institutionalising unlawful practice.
For the 8000 migrants who have managed to cross the border to Lithuania, Poland or Latvia, ELDH calls on the EU to ensure that shelter, food and clothing are provided and not to endorse:
· automatic detention on arrival
· restriction of the right to claim asylum
· reduction in the standard of reception conditions
· restrictions on the right to seek legal advice
· removal to their country of origin or a third country after a person has applied for asylum without any examination as to whether that person’s human rights will be breached on return.
This contradicts the international legal principle of non refoulement
international law, infringement and disciplinary action should be taken.
3. Counteract repression of civil society, media and legal practitioners
Human rights activists providing humanitarian and legal assistance both on the border and in their own countries should not be criminalised. The border should be accessible to international media and monitored by independent actors to ensure that EU and international law is respected. Acts of violence by state enforcers and others should be condemned and investigated”.
