Statement in support of Franck Magennis, Fahad Ansari, and Daniel Grütters
/Our comrade Franck Magennis has been instructed by Riverway Law to represent Hamas in its application to be de-proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000. That Act, which provides for the proscription of organisations which the Home Secretary considers engage in or promote terrorism, naturally contains provision for any proscribed organisation to challenge that designation.
As a result of submitting that application Franck and the lawyers involved in the case have been vilified by the right wing press and in some instances identified both with his client and their cause. There are dark lessons from history about where such conflation can lead.
Principle 16 of the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers states that lawyers must be able to perform all their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference; and shall not suffer, or be threatened with, prosecution or administrative, economic or other sanctions for any action taken in accordance with recognised professional duties, standards and ethics. Furthermore, in accordance with Principle 18, lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions.
We are concerned that some of media coverage risks the well-being and safety of Franck and his colleagues. We condemn any such coverage which takes such risks recklessly or otherwise.
Addition, 15 April 2025: The Haldane Society extends solidarity to all three lawyers. However, particular solidarity is extended to Fahad Ansari, the solicitor on the case, who has been subject to racist and vitriolic abuse compromising his safety. This is is encouraged by the media coverage referenced above, which is completely unacceptable.